![]() ![]() Among the best parts are her discussions of such scholars as Ettore Pais and Umberto Zanotti Bianchi, whose research considered Magna Graecia from very different intellectual and ideological backgrounds and agendas. The narrative is taken into the later 19th and the 20th centuries. #MAGNA GRAECIA PUBLISHERS FULL#Ceserani provides a full analysis of the connection between Hellenic South Italy and the emerging world of scholarly archaeology centered on Eduard Gerhard and the Instituto di Corrispondenza Archeologica. Much useful discussion is devoted to 19th-century regional exploration and to explorers such as Francois Lenormont. She starts with the 18th-century Neapolitan Enlightenment, when local savants and antiquarians debated archaeology with the erudits of the Grand Tour. It is an intellectual journey that takes the reader from the 18th century down to the decades after World War II. Largely forgotten is the sack of Tarentum, which also produced much sculpture and a very live Livius Andronicus, who helped lay the foundations of Latin literature.Ĭeserani sets out to explore this enigma in modern classical and archaeological scholarship. Well known is the taking of Syracuse, which produced much sculpture and a very dead Archimedes. Representative are the contrasting stories of the sacks of Syracuse and Tarentum in the Second Punic War. Yet the region of Pythagorean Croton, extravagant Sybaris, and opulent Tarentum remain marginal to students of the Greek world. With the collapse of the Soviet Union, the Greek Black Sea has received increasing attention. However, East Greece and Sicily have long held fascinations, especially for archaeologists. Greek archaeology remains focused on the mainland. It served as a base for Roman land and sea operations in the reconquest of Bruttium and the western Italiote cities.Magna Graecia, the Hellenic lands of South Italy, has long been, and to a certain degree remains, the lost stepchild of Hellenic studies. Indeed, Hannibal never secured all of Bruttium and western Magna Graecia, because Rhegion, which commanded the Straits of Messina, remained loyal to Rome throughout the war. It would take nearly a year to capture Petelia and Consentia, and only after these cities capitulated did Hannibal's commanders begin to gain the support of western Italiote cities such as Locri and Croton. But some Bruttian communities, including the important cities of Petelia and Consentia, remained loyal to Rome, at least initially. Most of the Bruttians appear to have come over to the Carthaginians quite readily, though whether they did so before Mago's or Hanno's arrival is not clear. In the meantime, Hanno took over operations in Bruttium, though his forces did not reach the area until August at the earliest. Thence, Mago marched into Bruttium to encourage rebellion, and finally returned to Carthage and reported Hannibal's victories to the Carthaginian senate. ![]() At this point Hannibal divided his forces and marched into Campania, leaving part of his army with Mago to secure the loyalty of any remaining pro-Roman settlements ‘of that region’ ( regionis eius). After Cannae, Hannibal waited a few days in Apulia and then proceeded to Samnium there he gained the loyalty of Compsa as the pro-Roman aristocracy fled the city. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |